This file contains the current work with filtering and freezing of
smanob files stemming from the dict directory.
It is aimed to ease the communication between Cip, Lene and Trond, the reason
is that the 00_readme.txt file was meant for the steady filtering and reverting files.

Reverting smaswe to swesma

VIC - Very Important Check before any reverting to swesma:
 - check the language flag in all files systematically (cip)

   ==> done

1. Cip supposes that Ryan, Lene & Co don't need all attributes
from sma-lemma into sma-translation (ignore stat="pref" for now).
E.g.

<l gen_only="A+Attr" pos="a" stem="2syll">suejies</l>
vs.
<t pos="a">suejies</t>

2. Cip's reverting script copies the <re>-elements into the tg-element of the reverted file.
   Trond means that re-info is not needed at all in smaoahpa. It is true that apparently there
   is no re-element in the nobsma-files but there is some re-information in the l-element.

nobsma>grep '(om ' * | wc -l 
      42
v_nobsma.xml:         <l pos="v">reise seg (om hår)</l>
v_nobsma.xml:         <l pos="v">reke uten lov (om barn)</l>
v_nobsma.xml:         <l pos="v">slippe lett (om bark)</l>

Question: What to do with that? Shall I add the re automatically to the l-element in brackets?

Trond: Framlegg:
       Lag to lister og (la lingvistane) ta ein titt.




3. weird IDs:

n_swesma.xml:   <e id="renoxe under första året efter kastrering, om den tappar hornen_n"
n_swesma.xml:   <e id="träd där man fästat skavjärn på för att dra skinn genom för mjukgörning_phrase_n"
prop_swesma.xml:   <e id="Renbetesdistrikt i området Nærøy, Leka, Namsskogan, Bindal, Brønnøy, Grane_phrase_prop"

Question to Ryan: Do you have problems with the db feeding? Is the id field big enough to store that?
Is that needed at all?

4. status of te-elements in the smanob (nobsma?) files:

 according to Lene, te should be deleted. cip started to do so for nob but not for swe.
 the reason is that we agreed that when reverting the dictionary, these should become re.
 The rest will be deleted after the successful reversion of smaX to swesma.





==========================================
Additional comments to Lene's idea of assigning sma pos multiword to the nob
entries after reverting:
==========================================

<quote>
Hei!

Jeg husker ikke om vi har snakka om det tidligere, men: multiword skal
fremdeles være multiword etter snuinga. Dvs at pos-informasjonen ikke
skal ha noen funskjon i snuingsprosessen. Selv om nob-oversettelsen
består av ett ord, skal det tilhører multiword-fila. Multiword viser
til at sma er multiword.

- Lene
</quote>


1. this information is anyhow in the data, namely with the sma entrie
(which becomes now a translation of the nob entry)

Trond: Viss mwe-info kan bli styrt frå same swesma-fil er det greit.
       Lenes poeng slik eg ser det var ikkje at vi må ha ei multiword
       __fil__, men at ordpara skal vere mwe også etter snuinga.
      

2. after reverting you have also dupicates stemming from different
smanob files in the nob data; these have to be merged in order not to
get some messy stuff with the database

Trond: Ok, dette er eit teknisk spørsmål.

3. technically, it is possible to have the former multiword entries in
the same file DESPITE the fact that the nob entries don't carry with
them the pos "multiword": the entries can be traced basen on the pos
of the sma "translations" (see 1. item above)

Trond: Nettopp. Altså: separat fil eller ikkje er eit teknisk spørsmål, 
       det viktige er å halde på den semantiske gruppa Multiword.